Ukraine's long-range drone campaign against Russia's oil industry is simultaneously hitting three sensitive areas of the war economy at once: fuel production, domestic logistics of petroleum products, and fiscal stability, Vakhtang Partsvania argues in a comment for Riddle Russia.
The strikes have not collapsed the oil sector as a whole and have not cut off Russia's export revenues – but they have shifted the structure of the losses, forcing Russia to export more crude instead of refining it domestically, at the cost of value added, regional fuel shortages, rising gasoline prices, accelerating inflation and ever more expensive compensatory budget payments.
The pivot point was the strike on the Moscow Refinery in Kapotnya, one of Russia's largest plants with annual capacity of around 11mn tonnes of crude. The Moscow region accounts for 14% of Russia's passenger cars – 7.4mn of 53mn nationwide – handles 19% of the country's road freight, and its aviation hub carries roughly 40% of Russia's passenger air traffic; a prolonged shutdown there is as much a logistics problem as a production one, since even fuel sourced from elsewhere must still reach the capital through an already-strained transport network.
"Russia's oil sector had long been considered one of the most resilient parts of the economy," Partsvania writes. "Strikes on refineries, however, exert a different kind of pressure. Sanctions reduce export margins and raise transaction costs. Drone attacks impair the physical ability to refine oil and supply the domestic market. This is no longer a question of a discount to Brent or freight rates — it is a question of the availability of gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel inside the country."
That is already reflected in the trade figures: Russian production of coke and petroleum products fell 13.5% y/y in May 2026, with the January-May decline running at almost 5%. More recent estimates published by the Financial Times put the fall in throughput at 45% in July.
Strikes intensified from late March, when the year-on-year decline was already around 9%; May marked the steepest fall in years. Repair is also harder than it looks – modern refining needs complex secondary processing units (isomerisation, cracking, hydrotreating) whose specialised components, pumps, catalysts and electronics were often sourced from Western suppliers now blocked by sanctions, producing what Partsvania calls a "double strike": the drone causes physical damage, and sanctions prolong recovery. Repeated hits compound the problem – the Ryazan and Saratov refineries have each been struck 15 times, accumulating equipment "fatigue" that raises failure risk even without new strikes.
The consequences have already reached households and the central bank. Fuel-purchase restrictions – per-person limits, jerry-can bans, priority supply for essential services – have spread to 83 Russian regions. Weekly gasoline prices rose 3.0% and 1.6% in the second half of June alone, with diesel up 2.7% and 2.2%, and price rises registered in 82 regions – sharpest in annexed Sevastopol, at 30%. The Bank of Russia's decision to cut its key rate by just 25 basis points on June 19, to 14.25%, reflected exactly this pressure: rising fuel prices amplifying inflation risk and narrowing the room for monetary easing. Nevertheless, political pressure on CBR governor Elvia Nabiullina by Russian President Vladimir Putin himself, who called for more rate cuts twice in two months, saw the governor cut rates again to 14% in July.
Partsvania argues there has been a shift in Ukrainian targeting logic: earlier strikes on export terminals produced dramatic visuals but limited economic effect, since tank farms are designed to lose individual tanks rather than whole facilities, and loadings usually resume once pipeline and rail links survive. Refineries sit at a narrower chokepoint between crude production and the domestic fuel market – knocking out processing capacity does not make the oil disappear, but it turns the oil itself into the problem, since not every refinery can absorb redirected volumes or produce the right product mix, and moving fuel to deficit regions strains the same railways and pipelines already under pressure elsewhere in the war economy.