Profit of Russian banking sector tanks following summer bail-outs

Profit of Russian banking sector tanks following summer bail-outs
Profit of Russian banks drop in September on bail-outs
By Vadim Dumes in Paris October 11, 2017

The cost of bailing out a string of failed banks in the last quarter means Russia’s aggregate banking sector profits fell heavily in September, going negative for the first time in years.

The total net profit of Russian banking sector in January-September declined to RUB675bn ($11.7bn) from RUB997bn seen in January-August, the Central Bank of Russia (CBR) said on October 11. That is a fall of minus RUB322bn month-on-month, a big aberration from a two-year run of steadily improving month-on-month profits.

The drop in banking profit was attributed to a one-off recognition of "negative financial results of banking groups" that are undergoing a bail-out with the help of the newly established Fund for Consolidation of Banking Sector (FKBS), the regulator commented.

In August and September the CBR had to take over Financial Corporation Otkrytie and Binbank (aka B&N Bank), the largest private banks in the ongoing sector clean-up yet, since the problems with Vnesheconombank (VEB) in 2016 and Bank of Moscow in 2011 that needed $16bn and $14bn bailouts respectively.

If this summers losses had not been booked then the net profit of the banking sector in nine months of 2017 would have been RUB1.1 trillion. The reserves for possible losses went up by 6.5% in September and 13.6% year-to-date to RUB6.2 trillion.

In the recent outlook upgrade on Russia's sovereign rating Fitch dismissed the idea of banking risks, but days later issued a report cautiously critical of the Central Bank of Russia managing and spending on the sector clean-up.

Fitch estimates that the state has invested over RUB2 trillion in the biggest state banks, or about 1.5% of GDP, through various refinancing and support mechanisms, which de facto represent indirect bail-outs. This spending came in addition to RUB2.7 trillion cost of compensating depositors of failed privately owned lenders.

Part of the blame for the situation lies on the CBR, Fitch believes, as asset problems "are typically the result of aggressive growth through mergers" that included bank rescues under the old bail-out mechanism approved by the CBR.

Out of the 30 bail-outs, 10 ended up with the banks entrusted by the CBR to take over failed peers got in trouble themselves, including the controversial cases of Financial Corporation Otrkitye, B&N Bank, Probiznes Bank, and Tatfondbank.

However, the new bail-out regime, by which the CBR consolidation fund FKBS acquires and recapitalises failed banks so that they immediately meet all regulatory requirements, is welcomed by Fitch as it should deter weaker buyers and attract stronger ones.

Previously in the old bail-out regime, the rescued banks did not have to comply with regulatory ratios while they rebuilt capital from income supported by cheap CBR funding, which attracted weak buyers to acquire rescued banks and transfer toxic assets into them.